RBI has cut 125 bps in 12 months.
Repo rate 6.50% to 5.25%.
Before you celebrate cheaper EMIs
Lets understand rate cut affects with US Fed rates as example
2001- 2003 | 550 bps cut 6.5% to 1% (post dotcom crash)
Housing prices rose 30% over the next 3 years.
2008–2009 | 500 bps cut 5.25% to 0.25% (post subprime lending crash)
What followed was one of the longest bull markets in U.S. history, S&P 500 up ~400% in 11 years.
2020 | 150 bps cut in 11 days (covid crisis)
Nasdaq doubled within 12 months. U.S. home prices rose 40% in 2 years.
Lower rates → higher present value of future cash flows → asset repricing → wealth effect → more risk appetite.
The Fed proved this three times over
Each aggressive cut, a post crisis response, triggered a multi-year asset cycle.
But India's context is different.
This isn't a crisis cut.
Inflation is at 3.6%.
NPAs at decade lows.
GDP holding at 6.5-7%.
RBI is normalizing, not rescuing.
That changes the outcome significantly.
As per RBI’s monetary transmission studies
100 bps repo cut historically takes
2-3 quarters to fully transmit to lending rates
Banks often transmit only 60-70% of the cut to borrowers.
No mania. But real consequences
-Rate-sensitive sectors re-rate (NBFC, real estate, auto)
-₹38L Cr in FDs faces quiet reinvestment risk
-Housing affordability improves at the margin
-Risk appetite expands
Here's what most miss
Rate cuts are a redistribution mechanism
-From savers to borrowers.
-From cash holders to asset holders
-From the risk-averse to the risk-tolerant.
If you do not hold assets, this cycle won't work for you.
Easy money doesn't create wealth.
Correct asset allocation does.
As does understanding market cycles